Abstract: . . .  with regard to the interface between gender and group-based dominance orientation, the cumulative empirical evidence at hand thus far is more consistent with the invariance rather than the interaction hypothesis. While the arbitrary-set categories of social class and ethnicity clearly do conform to the expectations of the interaction hypothesis, di?erences between males and females with respect to SDO and group-based anti-egalitarianism do not. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Data collection in Israel was supported . . .
. . .  speci®c domains, i.e. the domain of group-based social dominance orientation and reproductive behavior. We make no claims about male/female di?erences outside of this domain. In conclusion, with regard to the interface between gender and group-based dominance orientation, the cumulative empirical evidence at hand thus far is more consistent with the invariance rather than the interaction hypothesis. While the arbitrary-set categories of social class and ethnicity clearly do conform to the expectations . . .
. . .  domains, i.e. the domain of group-based social dominance orientation and reproductive behavior. We make no claims about male/female di?erences outside of this domain. In conclusion, with regard to the interface between gender and group-based dominance orientation, the cumulative empirical evidence at hand thus far is more consistent with the invariance rather than the interaction hypothesis. While the arbitrary-set categories of social class and ethnicity clearly do conform to the expectations of the . . .
. . .  invariance rather than the interaction hypothesis. While the arbitrary-set categories of social class and ethnicity clearly do conform to the expectations of the interaction hypothesis, di?erences between males and females with respect to SDO and group-based anti-egalitarianism do not. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Data collection in Israel was supported in part by a Lady Davis Graduate Fellowship and a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research. 60 J. Sidanius et al. Copyright # 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. . . .
. . .  30 , 41±67 (2000) Page 21 REFERENCES Abelson, R. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin , 97 , 129±133. Alatalo, R. V., Burke, T., Dann, J. & Hanotte, O. et al. (1996). Paternity, copulation disturbance and female choice in lekking black grouse. Animal Behaviour , 52 , 861±873. Alatalo, R. V., Carlson, A. & Lundberg, A. (1988). The search cost in mate choice of . . .
. . .  Bulletin , 97 , 129±133. Alatalo, R. V., Burke, T., Dann, J. & Hanotte, O. et al. (1996). Paternity, copulation disturbance and female choice in lekking black grouse. Animal Behaviour , 52 , 861±873. Alatalo, R. V., Carlson, A. & Lundberg, A. (1988). The search cost in mate choice of . . .
--3000,6,250,3144,58154