Abstract: . . .  T . 2002. Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese. JPR , 31, 4. Nakayama, M. 1995. Scrambling and Probe Recognition. Japanese Sentence Processing , eds. R. Mazuka & N. Nagai. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association. Polinsky, M., & Eric, P. 2002. ‘Backward Control’, Linguistic Inquiry . . .
. . .  The results support the control as A-movement analysis. It correctly predicted that Pattern 2 is more difficult to process than Pattern 1, providing evidence for BC. We argue that Pattern 3 did not incur heavier processing cost because of the ease of the scrambling condition in the experiment (Nakayama . . .
. . .  Intuitive Knowledge of Linguistic Co-Reference. Cognition . 62, 3. Hornstein, N. 2003 On control. In Minimalist Syntax , ed. R Hendrick: 6-81. Blackwell, Oxford. Monahan, P. 2003. Backward object control in Korean. WCCFL 22 . Miyamoto, E. T . 2002. Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese. JPR . . .
. . .  Recognition. Japanese Sentence Processing , eds. R. Mazuka & N. Nagai. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association. Polinsky, M., & Eric, P. 2002. ‘Backward Control’, Linguistic Inquiry 33. Ueno, M., & Kluender, R. 2003. Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling. Brain & Language , 86.  . . .
--1190,4,149,1496,5948