Abstract: . . .  encoding is not an automatic process, as previously assumed. You don’t look away to avoid interference Introduction to Psycholinguistics canary bird animal ostrich mammal Spreading activation in semantic network yellow doctor dentist fever green baby cradle bed hospital sun rain heat grass nurse delirium Introduction to Psycholinguistics canary bird animal ostrich mammal Spreading activation in semantic network yellow doctor dentist fever green baby cradle bed hospital sun rain heat grass nurse delirium  . . .
. . .  automatic process, as previously assumed. You don’t look away to avoid interference Introduction to Psycholinguistics canary bird animal ostrich mammal Spreading activation in semantic network yellow doctor dentist fever green baby cradle bed hospital sun rain heat grass nurse delirium Introduction to Psycholinguistics canary bird animal ostrich mammal Spreading activation in semantic network yellow doctor dentist fever green baby cradle bed hospital sun rain heat grass nurse delirium  . . .
. . .  psycholinguistics Page 1 1 Introduction to Psycholinguistics Lecture 2: Experimental Design and Analysis Alissa Melinger Computerlinguistik Universität des Saarlandes Introduction to Psycholinguistics Today’s Lecture n The Empirical Research Cycle n Fundamentals of Experiment Design q Types of Variables q Sources of Variances q Types of designs n How to interpret the results of experiments: statistics q Descriptive and inferential statistics q Main effects and interactions and what they tell us n Some common . . .
. . .  to Psycholinguistics Anovas n The Anova tells you whether the pattern of data you have is reliably due to your manipulation or due to other sources of variance that are unavoidable, such as natural human variation. n The Anova gives you an F value which = ratio of the variance associated with your experimental manipulation over the variance associated with noise (human variation, external influences, differences in the materials, etc). You want relatively little noise compared to the variance associated with your manipulation. So, you want a BIG value for your F. n Based on the value of your test . . .
. . .  antecedents read faster or slower than infrequent ones? n Is a frequency effect present and the same for both types of anaphors? q If yes, then we’ll two main effects and no interaction between them. q If no, then we have an interaction between our two effects. Introduction to Psycholinguistics 2 x2 designs, van Gompel & Majid, 2004 n Are repeated NPs read faster or slower than Pronouns? q 343 vs.289, diff= 54ms n Are Frequent antecedents read faster or slower than infrequent ones? q 304 vs. 328, diff = 24 ms n Is a frequency effect present and the same for both types of anaphors? q Repeated NP, . . .
--3000,5,300,3083,24946